Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG HSM II Macro Zoom Lens for Pentax Digital SLR Cameras
- Lens Construction: 18 Elements in 15 Groups Angle of View: 17.6 – 6.2 degrees Number of Diaphragm Bl
This large aperture thelephoto zoom lens has a minimum focusing distance of 100cm (39.4) and maximum magnification of 1:3.5. Two SLD (Special Low Dispersion) and three ELD (Extraordinary Low Dispersion) glass elements provide excellent correction for all types of aberrations. The super multi-layer coating reduces flare and ghosting. High image quality is assured throughout the entire zoom range. This lens incorporates HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor), ensuring a quiet and high speed AF and full-time manual focusing capability. An adjustable and removable tripod collar is included as a standard component.
List Price: $ 799.00
Price: $ 929.00
Also Recommended:
Nikon D3000 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens (25462)…
The Canon 5157B002 includes the EOS Rebel T3 Digital SLR Camera and the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS type II Lens. This camera and le…
Sony DSLR Alpha DSLR-A230L 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera Kit With Sony 18-55MM Lens + Deluxe Photography: Capture your precious moment…
Find More Digital Slr Products
Cannot tell the difference between Canon and Sigma.,
I have both the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 and this lens. The version I received is as clear and sharp as the Canon 70-200mm version and ALOT less expensive! The bokeh is as good. When photographing a local high school senior session recently, I shot the Sigma and my associate shot with the Canon lens. We dumped all our images together and aside from style, you could not tell which images had been taken with which lens. The bodies were both 40Ds. I have to look at the metadata to tell which ones are which.
If you are making the decision about which lens to buy, try this lens out. With Amazon’s great customer service, if the lens doesn’t work out send it back. But I am pretty sure you will keep it. I would encourage you to try this lens out before dropping almost $1000 more for the Canon counterpart.
Was this review helpful to you?
Great lens…not a cheap alternative to the Nikon,
I was worried when I bouught this lens because I had only tried the Tamron copy, but my only experience with non-Nikon is with Sigma. I LOVE this lens. I got it for shooting sporting events for my university newspaper, and have had no problems in the month that I’ve had it. It autofocuses faster than the Tamron. A monopod isn’t necessary because it’s such a fast lens. Even at night with stadium lighting, the AF has little trouble.
The best thing I’ve heard for people wanting to shoot sports since buying this “cheap copy” lens came from a professional on the sidelines the firtst time I used my new lens. He said to my question about the Nikon 70-200mm, “Honestly, I turn the VR off when I’m not doing still portrait shots because it gets out of whack when I start following a moving person.”
Made me feel VERY content with my decision to buy the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8
Was this review helpful to you?