Pentax K20D 14.6MP Digital SLR Camera with Shake Reduction and DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL II Lens

3 Replies to “Pentax K20D 14.6MP Digital SLR Camera with Shake Reduction and DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL II Lens”

1. Alex Vox says:

   May 2, 2011 at 2:19 am

   111 of 120 people found the following review helpful:

   
   Unquestionably best camera I ever touched. Unbelievable photographic tool!, March 17, 2008

   By 

   Alex Vox (Winnetka, IL) –

   Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)

   This review is from: Pentax K20D 14.6MP Digital SLR Camera with Shake Reduction (Body Only) (Electronics)

   I had a pleasure to use this Pentax’s baby for three days. This camera takes photography as far as it never was before under $8.000 price tag. The image quality is stunning. I especially like this rich tremendous color rendition that looks like mid format color slide of 6×9. The tone gradations are simply endless. If you take picture of sunset it will be the best sunset you ever seen.
   I will not describe endless technical data details but I must stress how smart, convenient and relevant all the menus! You have a photography tools in your hands, not the computerized toy for browsing menus. The controls placement is the best I ever seen in any brand. Everything is under your fingers, everything is assignable. The camera reacts in the way you expect, it feels solid, complete.
   It is pleasure to hold it, the balance is very good. This camera’s software allows remote shooting (just like k10d) and if used in studio may be entirely controlled by computer. The ability to use the internal flash as a controller is very nice! The ability to store preview is very nice! The shift preview on shutter is super cool! The viewfinder is nice, clear and bright!If you had experience with K10D, you will find these awesome Pentax invented modes related to auto ISO settings.
   The image quality is second to none. While there are many good cameras are around, this one of the league on itself. The tonality, sharpness, expressiveness of this cam is outstanding. What is even more outstanding is the combination of shooting experiences that end up in the final image. You feel that you control it to any degree you wish. The final image may be whatever you tune it to be. Make a profile and get it over sharpened as Canon, oversaturated as Sony or over contrasted as Nikon. Mix is in any way you pleased. You have any number of cameras inside. I personally enjoyed portraits and nature shots I made with it. With awesome tonal variations, countless gradations in shadows, natural and lifelike skin tones. This camera does equally good job on dark skins as well. And it looks real, photographically rich and not exaggerated.
   In short, my three days of hands on experience with this camera I walked off very impressed. Hugely impressed.

   Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

   Was this review helpful to you? 
   

   
   |

    Comments (11)

   Reply
2. James E. Maynard says:

   May 2, 2011 at 1:40 am

   108 of 109 people found the following review helpful:

   
   A hands on review of Pentax’s new flagship digital SLR, May 9, 2008

   By 

   James E. Maynard (Seattle WA USA) –
   
     

   Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)

   This review is from: Pentax K20D 14.6MP Digital SLR Camera with Shake Reduction (Body Only) (Electronics)

   I have been a Pentax owner since the 1950’s when the first Heiland Pentax SLR was introduced to the market. This is my 3rd Pentax digital SLR, the first two being the 6 megapixel 1stDS and the 10 megapixel K10D. This new model is a significant upgrade from the K10D, and at 14.6 megapixels, provides significantly more resolution in the crops I make from the original images. What this allows is for me to go to smaller crops (increased area enlargement) and still maintain excellent resolution. Another significant feature is the new imaging device from Samsung, producing, for me, low noise excellent quality photos at sensitivities as high as 1600 ISO.
   To me, one of the most significant features of this camera, also found on my earlier K10D, is the RAW button on the left side of the camera body. This enables me to shoot most of my photos in JPEG, but allows me to go to RAW for a single image that I really want to get the most out of. This feature really conserves memory card space, but allows shooting of intermittent RAW images when they are really needed. This is a feature that I believe is unique to Pentax. At the highest quality (least compression) JPEG setting, the camera produces 10 megabyte images, which provide plenty of detail and excellent color.
   The quality of the shake reduction capability seems, to me, to be improved over the K10D. I have been able to shoot sharp photos at F3.5 at a 30th of a second at a focal length of 250 mm.
   The camera is extremely well built and, for this reason, is slightly heavier than other brands of comparable size. But the small extra weight and the fact that the camera feels well in the hand makes for really steady shots.
   A new feature is live image production on the 2.7 inch rear screen, which is somewhat larger than that on the K10D. Being a long time SLR user, I don’t use this feature very much. But it seems to be the up and coming thing on new digital SLR’s.
   The internal software of the camera has really been upgraded and includes an in camera capability to convert RAW images to TIFF or JPEG, a really neat feature if one is on the road and doesn’t have access to the computer software necessary to process RAW images but yet wants to view them on other portable imaging devices.
   I bought my camera without a lens and separately purchased the new 18-250 F 3.5-6.3 Pentax zoom lens and the 50 mm F 1.4 Pentax lens, which serves as a very short telephoto, wonderful for taking pictures of people. This is the combination I would recommend. The 18-250 appears to be manufactured for Pentax by TAMRON and is an excellent lens in my opinion. It is also quite versatile, giving a 28 mm field of view at wide angle and 375 mm at full telephoto. The 50mm F 1.4 is really inexpensive, at about $199 from reputable internet dealers, and is one of the sharpest lenses ever produced by Pentax. This lens is a real “sleeper” and should be owned by any Pentax DSLR owner for low light and portrait photography.
   At about $1250-1299 street price for the body alone, the camera is not cheap. But it is a prosumer model and priced somewhat below comparable Canon and Nikon models. It is providing me with wonderful performance and I highly recommend it.

   Dr. James E. Maynard

   Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

   Was this review helpful to you? 
   

   
   |

    Comments (4)

   Reply
3. P. VANDALEN says:

   May 2, 2011 at 1:32 am

   237 of 238 people found the following review helpful:

   
   Nice Improvement Over the K10D Deserves More Credit, June 3, 2008

   By 

   P. VANDALEN –
   
     

   Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)

   This review is from: Pentax K20D 14.6MP Digital SLR Camera with Shake Reduction (Body Only) (Electronics)

   If Pentax were a bit more serious about increasing the sales of their cameras to first-time Pentax buyers, they’d be making some changes to their marketing strategy. It’s unfortunate that with most consumer/professional camera reviews, the Pentax products get dinged in relation to their competitors when they shouldn’t have to be. You can see this in the Consumer Reports review of DSLRs and other reviews such as PopPhoto. The problem is that these reviews are performed with tested cameras at their default settings, and Pentax chooses to “compromise” the performance of their cameras by requiring custom adjustments to bring about the true potential of the product. The K10D took a hit with its lower-contrast, soft and dark pictures when in default mode. Change the settings and you have a camera every bit in step with its competition at the time. Now the K20D suffers the same fate with the decision to make Noise Reduction-OFF the default setting. The PopPhoto test of the K20D actually resulted in higher noise levels than the K10D. Indeed, when I first compared the two cameras, I found them both the same at ISO 1600 for the amount of visible noise. Obviously, this is a shocker when you consider that the K20 uses the new CMOS sensor as opposed to the K10’s CCD. Although the detail was higher in the K20, the noise was no better. That is, until I set noise reduction to “weak.” What a difference! Comparing shots taken at the same settings between the two cameras (K10 default has noise reduction on) but with the K20 at the full 14.6 mp setting and highest JPEG quality with noise reduction at “weak,” and the K20’s image is strikingly cleaner and sharper. There’s no doubt the resolution of the K20’s image is hands-down superior to the K10. But you won’t read about this in any review unless they choose to turn on noise reduction. There is a very slight loss of detail with NR on, but the resolution of the K20’s sensor is so good anyway that the loss is negligible (especially with the Pentax DA* 50-135 lens). Certainly experienced photographers could argue the Pentax reasoning behind the default setting issue, but from a marketing perspective, subjective reviews and objective lab results based on lesser picture performance of default settings can only hurt potential sales when a buyer sees that the 40D or the D300 has clearly better performance in the noise level competition. When you’re going up against the giants, you need to exploit the maximum potential of your product, and I believe Pentax has failed to do that.

   Having a K10 and a number of Pentax lenses already, I couldn’t quite justify jumping ship for the excellent Canon 40D or Nikon D300. But in the end, the price of the K20 was well-justified. The first feature that sold me on the camera is one that only true professional cameras have and isn’t even mentioned in the K20 pitch – the ability to fine-tune the auto focus system so that if a lens is front or back-focusing, you can correct for it. This allows you to change the relationship between the point you focus on to the front-to-back area around that object that is also in focus known as the depth of field. This feature could save you a lot of heartache with poorly calibrated lenses that would otherwise be useless. The second feature of this camera that sold me is the improved sensor with its 14.6 MP rating and increased resolution. ISO 1600 shots are now a non-issue compared to the K10. Overall, the K20’s pictures tend to be a tad bit warmer than the K10’s, but I’ve also found them to better handle high-contrast transitions between bright and dark with less blown-out bright areas. This was evident in sunset shots where the brightest areas of the orange clouds went yellow in the K10 but kept their detail and color with the K20 (shooting in JPEG). No longer is there an issue with under-exposed shots as with the K10, and normal settings are set close to sharpness/contrast ideals, I’ve found. But of course, it’s all adjustable to just about any result you could want. Just be prepared to deal with some pretty big file sizes on the highest quality JPEG setting – about 11MB. Shoot in RAW and it’s almost twice that size. 4GB SD cards suddenly seem puny.

   After several thousand shots with the K20, there are a few things that I would consider a bit of a deficit with this camera’s performance. First and foremost is the burst rate of 3 frames per second. This is perfectly fine for just about all shooting situations except sports. If you plan to do sports photography, this is not the camera for you. Way too much action happens between frames at that slow rate. The other area where performance lags a bit is with the auto focus system: it’s just too slow at the very times you need it to work faster than it can. The issue remains a nuisance from kit lenses to the DA* SDM lenses in low-light or with moving objects. Live-View was not something I cared much about,…

   Read more

   Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

   Was this review helpful to you? 
   

   
   |

    Comments (18)

   Reply